What is an LLM tracking tool?

An LLM tracking tool monitors how large language models (like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity) mention, cite, and represent your brand. Instead of just tracking search rankings, it shows where your brand appears in AI-generated answers.

How is this different from traditional SEO tools?

Traditional SEO tools measure backlinks and Google rankings. LLM Scout focuses on AI visibility—how often and in what context AI assistants surface your brand in their replies. It's the missing layer of SEO in the age of AI-driven search.

What insights do I get from LLM Scout?

You get insights on which prompts and topics trigger your brand to appear, whether AI uses your brand as a source or recommendation, the websites and sources AI relies on to talk about you, and how your visibility compares to competitors over time.

How can marketing teams use these insights?

Marketing teams can optimize content so AI assistants reference your brand correctly, close visibility gaps where competitors are winning, improve brand reputation by influencing sources AI pulls from, and build an AI-first SEO strategy to stay ahead of the search shift.

Do I need technical setup?

No — LLM Scout is designed for busy teams. Just sign up, enter your brand and focus topics, and get weekly insights.

Yes. We never store or share your internal brand data. LLM Scout only tracks public AI responses — the same ones your customers see. Your account information and tracking setup remain private and secure at all times.

What is LLM SEO (Large Language Model Search Engine Optimisation)?

LLM SEO is the practice of optimising your content and brand signals so large language models surface your brand in their answers, not just on web result pages.

What is AIO (AI Optimisation)?

AIO means improving your content, structure, and third‑party coverage so AI systems can understand, trust, and recommend your brand.

Is Profound or Peec AI better?

Neither is better outright, they suit different buyers. Profound is the stronger pick for enterprises that need deep answer-engine analytics, real-time topic data and built-in content workflows, and can carry a four-figure monthly cost. Peec AI is the stronger pick for marketing teams and agencies that want clean prompt tracking, share of voice and competitor gaps at a mid-market price with a light learning curve.

How much do Profound and Peec AI cost?

Profound starts around $99 a month, but that tier covers ChatGPT only. Three-engine coverage starts near $399 a month, and Enterprise is custom, reported by third parties at roughly $2,000 to $5,000 or more. Peec AI starts from about $80 a month billed annually for three models, rising to around $420 for the Advanced tier, with custom Enterprise pricing. Both have changed pricing recently, so confirm current figures with each vendor.

Which AI models does each tool track?

Profound tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, with Amazon Rufus flagged as coming. Peec AI covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews on its self-serve plans, and adds more models including Claude on Enterprise. Self-serve Peec plans include three models by default and charge for more.

Which is better for enterprise?

Profound is built for enterprise, with the widest engine coverage, Agent Analytics, API and SSO, and custom onboarding. Peec AI reaches enterprise too through its custom tier with unlimited prompts and full model access, and tends to be simpler to roll out. If procurement cares about SOC 2 or SSO, confirm both directly, since these sit on the top tiers.

Do these tools improve my AI ranking, or just measure it?

Both mainly measure. They tell you which prompts name you, which name a competitor, and how sentiment reads. Profound adds content workflows that act on what it finds. Neither guarantees a higher position in ChatGPT or Gemini, because the models decide that. The value is seeing the gaps so you can work them.

Is there a cheaper alternative to Profound and Peec AI?

Yes. Lighter tools such as Otterly.AI and LLM Scout cover the core signal, mention rate, citations, share of voice and competitor gaps across the main assistants, at a lower and flatter price than Profound's engine tiers or Peec's per-model add-ons. They trade some depth and some enterprise features for a shorter setup and a smaller bill.

Profound vs Peec AI: Which AI Visibility Tool Is Better?

Published January 15, 2026•Frank Vitetta

Both tools track whether your brand gets named in ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity. Profound is built for enterprise budgets and deep workflows. Peec AI fits marketing teams and agencies at a mid-market price. Here is how they compare, and where a lighter option fits.

below into the LLM Scout template. ========================================================== -->

TL;DR: Both tools answer the same question: when a buyer asks ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity for a recommendation, does your brand get named? They answer it for very different buyers. Profound is built for enterprise teams with enterprise budgets. Peec AI is built for marketing teams and agencies who want the same signal without the enterprise price. Here is how they compare, and where a lighter option fits.

The short version. Choose Profound if you are an enterprise or agency that needs deep answer-engine analytics, real-time topic data and built-in content workflows, and a four-figure monthly budget is not the blocker. Choose Peec AI if you are a marketing team or smaller agency that wants clean prompt tracking, share of voice and competitor gaps at a mid-market price. If both feel heavier or pricier than the job needs, the alternative at the end covers the same core signal from about $100 a month.

Side by side

	Profound	Peec AI
Built for	Enterprise and Fortune 500 marketing teams, and agencies serving them	In-house marketing teams and SEO agencies, mid-market and up
AI engines tracked	ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot and Claude, with Amazon Rufus flagged as coming	ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews on self-serve, with more models including Claude on Enterprise
Entry price	Starter around $99/mo, but that tier covers ChatGPT only. Three engines start on Growth at around $399/mo	Starter from about $80/mo billed annually, covering three models of your choice
Top tier	Enterprise is custom, with third-party reports putting it in the $2,000 to $5,000+ a month range	Advanced is around $420/mo billed annually. Enterprise is custom with unlimited prompts and full model access
Core tracking	Mentions, citations, share of voice, sentiment and position across answer engines	Prompts grouped by topic, share of voice, sentiment, position, and mentions split from explicit citations
Standout feature	Conversation Explorer, which surfaces real-time AI search volume and trending prompts that were previously invisible	Gap analysis and perception mapping, showing sources that cite rivals but not you and how the models frame your brand
Content optimisation	Built in. Workflows generate and optimise content aimed at getting picked up by answer engines	Not built in. Peec measures and diagnoses, you act on it in your own stack
Crawler and agent data	Agent Analytics tracks how AI bots crawl and act on your site	Crawlability auditing checks robots.txt compliance across AI crawlers
Integrations	API and SSO on Enterprise, exports on Growth and up	Looker Studio and MCP export to Claude, Cursor and n8n. API and SSO are Enterprise only
Learning curve	Steep. It is a lot of tool, and it rewards a team that will use all of it	Light. Most teams are reading useful data on day one

Prices and model coverage on both tools have moved more than once over the past year, so treat the figures above as a guide and confirm the current numbers on each vendor's pricing page before you commit.

What each tool is built for

Enterprise analytics console versus a simpler mid-market marketing dashboard

Profound

Profound is the heavyweight. It is used by thousands of marketers at large companies, and it is priced for them. Beyond mention and citation tracking, it adds Conversation Explorer for real-time prompt volume, Agent Analytics for how AI bots interact with your site, and Workflows that write and optimise content for answer engines inside the platform. That breadth is the point, and it is also the catch: the entry tier only watches ChatGPT, and the real coverage lives on Growth and Enterprise. If you have the budget and a team that will work the data, little else goes as deep.

Peec AI

Peec AI does the core job well and stays out of your way. Prompts are grouped by topic, so you see share of voice and sentiment by theme rather than as one flat number. Competitor benchmarking, citation versus mention splits, gap analysis and perception mapping are all there, and the interface is quick to read. It is the natural pick for a marketing team or agency that wants a reliable AI-visibility signal without a heavy rollout. The trade-offs are real too: three models by default, more cost more, and API and SSO sit behind Enterprise.

Which is better for your use case

Most people searching this comparison are really asking about one specific job. Here is the honest read on the common ones.

Your use case	Better pick	Why
Enterprise-scale coverage	Profound	More engines, deeper analytics, API and SSO, built for large teams
Small or mid-sized business	Peec AI	Lower entry price and a shorter learning curve for a lean team
Non-technical marketers	Peec AI	Clean interface that reads clearly without a specialist to run it
Automated content workflows	Profound	Workflows generate and optimise answer-engine content inside the tool
Finding high-impact topics and prompts	Profound	Conversation Explorer surfaces real-time and fast-rising prompts
Brand visibility and share of voice	Either	Both do it well. Peec groups by topic, Profound goes deeper across more engines
Competitor and citation gaps	Peec AI	Gap analysis names the sources citing rivals but not you
Product or SKU-level visibility	Profound	Shopping and Amazon Rufus coverage lean toward product queries
How AI bots crawl your site	Profound	Agent Analytics is built for crawler and agent behaviour
Country and language tracking	Peec AI	Multi-country tracking from the Advanced tier

Ranking higher in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude

Neither tool ranks you. Both measure whether you appear, on which prompts, and who appears instead. That measurement is the actual work: you cannot fix a gap in Gemini or Perplexity that you cannot see. Profound covers the widest set of engines out of the box and adds content workflows to act on what it finds. Peec covers the main engines on self-serve and puts Claude and the rest on Enterprise. For Claude specifically, check the current plan coverage before you buy, since it has moved between tiers.

Sentiment, accuracy and misinformation

Both tools score sentiment on the answers models give about you, and both let you read the raw responses. That is how you catch a model stating something wrong about your brand. Neither is a dedicated misinformation or fact-checking system, so treat the sentiment and response logs as your early-warning signal rather than a compliance tool.

Referral traffic from LLMs

This is where every tool in the category hits the same wall. ChatGPT, Claude, the Gemini app and Perplexity send publishers almost nothing in the way of first-party traffic data. Profound and Peec both work by asking the assistants your buyer questions and recording the answers, not by reading a traffic feed the assistants do not provide. If measuring referral clicks is the whole goal, pair either tool with your analytics and Search Console rather than expecting the visibility tool to close that gap alone.

How they compare to other AI visibility tools

Profound and Peec are not the only two names in the shortlist. The others worth knowing, briefly and fairly:

Otterly.AI is a lighter, lower-cost monitor aimed at smaller teams that want the basic mention and citation signal without the depth of the two above.
Semrush folds AI visibility into its wider SEO suite, which suits teams that already live in Semrush and want one login for search and AI.
Writesonic leans toward content generation with AI-visibility tracking attached, so the pitch is measure and produce in one place.
Evertune focuses on how models represent a brand across prompts and personas, more brand-perception than day-to-day tracking.
SimilarWeb, seoClarity and BrightEdge are enterprise platforms adding AI-visibility modules onto large existing analytics or SEO products.

The pattern across all of them is the same trade-off you see between Profound and Peec: more depth and more engines cost more, and simpler tools cost less but see less. The right pick is the one whose coverage and price match the job you actually have.

A lighter alternative worth a look

If you have read this far and neither the enterprise price of Profound nor the per-model add-ons of Peec fit the job, that is exactly the middle LLM Scout is built for. It tracks buyer prompts across the AI assistants, including the ones that report nothing back to publishers, and shows mention rate, citations, share of voice and the competitor gaps where AI names someone else instead of you. It is built to be readable without a specialist and to cover the core signal at a single, flat price rather than a tier ladder.

It is not trying to be Profound. There is no built-in content generation engine and no Fortune 500 feature list. If you need those, Profound earns its price. If you mainly need to know where you stand across the assistants and where the gaps are, without a four-figure invoice or a rollout, LLM Scout is the cheaper way to get that answer.

See where AI names you, and where it names your competitor

LLM Scout tracks buyer prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and shows your mention rate, citations, share of voice and competitor gaps, including the platforms that report nothing back to publishers.

Start 7-day free trial

Advanced plan, $99.99/mo after the trial.